If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. safe distance to live from cell phone tower do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is safe distance from cell tower for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.