If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. Find more information for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.