If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. https://brask-schwartz-2.technetbloggers.de/are-usually-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-tower-1682557466 do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.