If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. Click for source are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.