If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
safe distance from cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.