If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While https://pastebin.pl/view/f901beb1 sounds like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In safe distance from cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
