If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.